The floor of the Senate is once again the stage for a contentious debate over American identity and belonging. Senator Bernie Moreno (R-OH) has announced his plan to introduce the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025, a legislative effort that would force current U.S. citizens who hold a second nationality to renounce that foreign citizenship or face automatic loss of their American status. This is an assault on immigrants and an aggressive proposal, aimed at eliminating Dual Citizenship Removal, represents a profound philosophical attack on the modern, globalized American experience. From a Progressive Advocacy standpoint, this bill is not merely a policy change; it is a punitive measure that seeks to create a two-tiered system of citizenship, disproportionately affecting naturalized citizens and their families while undermining core constitutional protections. The central thesis is clear: this legislation must be unequivocally opposed as it threatens the rights, stability, and global connections of millions of Americans.

---

Policy Summary: The ‘All or Nothing’ Mandate

The proposed Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 is predicated on the notion that holding multiple citizenships creates "conflicts of interest and divided loyalties," a challenge to the traditional concept of "exclusive allegiance." The bill reportedly mandates that current dual citizens would have a one-year period after enactment to formally renounce their foreign citizenship via the Department of State. Failure to comply or notify the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of an intent to relinquish U.S. citizenship would result in the individual being reclassified as an “alien for purposes of the immigration laws,” effectively losing their U.S. status. Furthermore, any U.S. citizen who acquires a foreign citizenship in the future would automatically forfeit their American nationality. The legislation would require the State Department and DHS to establish complex tracking and enforcement systems to monitor and process the mass Dual Citizenship Removal.

The Core Arguments for the Bill

Proponents, including Senator Moreno, frame the bill as a necessary measure to reaffirm the unique and total commitment required of American citizenship. They argue that the Oath of Allegiance—where a naturalized citizen vows to "absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty"—should be taken literally and enforced with clear legal consequences. Their position suggests that in an era of complex global geopolitics, divided loyalty is a national security risk, and that a single, undivided allegiance is essential for the nation's integrity and political cohesion.

Progressive Rebuttal: Undermining Constitutional Citizenship

The arguments for eliminating dual citizenship are rooted in an outdated, isolationist view of the nation-state that fails to acknowledge the realities of a globalized world. For the progressive movement, this bill is deeply flawed, unconstitutional, and fundamentally anti-immigrant. The constitutional cornerstone of this debate is found in Supreme Court precedent, notably Afroyim v. Rusk (1967) and Vance v. Terrazas (1980), which established that U.S. citizenship cannot be involuntarily stripped by Congress without the individual’s explicit and voluntary intent to relinquish it. The current proposal’s mechanism—loss of citizenship through non-compliance—directly contradicts decades of established case law.

The legislation is effectively a political cudgel designed to intimidate immigrant and diaspora communities. The reality is that dual citizenship is overwhelmingly used to maintain vital family, cultural, and economic ties abroad, facilitating travel to see aging parents, retaining property rights, or ensuring inheritance. The bill ignores that many countries bestow citizenship by jus sanguinis (right of blood) and do not have a simple mechanism for renunciation, making compliance practically impossible for many. This forced choice would particularly penalize communities like those in Ohio (Somali, Nepali, Mexican, etc.) who rely on dual nationality to navigate their globalized lives.

The True Cost of Dual Citizenship Removal

This proposal represents a costly and impractical government overreach. To enforce the mass Dual Citizenship Removal, Congress would be required to fund a new, sprawling federal bureaucracy within the State Department and DHS, creating an unprecedented national registry of citizens’ private foreign affiliations. This logistical nightmare would strain the federal budget and redirect resources away from more urgent immigration and border management issues, such as reducing the massive backlogs in USCIS processing times.

The cultural and economic damage is equally severe. Dual nationality is a competitive advantage, not a liability. It provides U.S. citizens with enhanced access to foreign markets, research partnerships, and global talent pipelines. By forcing millions of highly educated, globally-connected citizens—including entrepreneurs, scientists, and business leaders—to sever their ties, the U.S. would diminish its soft power and global economic competitiveness. The bill targets the stability of families and undermines the dignity of the naturalization process, suggesting that the solemn oath taken by new citizens is inherently distrusted by the government.

Conclusion

The Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 is a dangerous and cynical piece of legislation that runs counter to the fundamental progressive values of inclusion, family unity, and global engagement. It is a veiled attack on the status of naturalized citizens, relying on xenophobic narratives of "divided loyalties" rather than sound policy analysis. We urge all members of the Senate, particularly those on the Judiciary Committee, to reject this measure. Defending the established constitutional right to citizenship and resisting attempts to create a second-class status for dual nationals is an imperative for all who believe in a truly free and interconnected America.

Call-to-Action: Contact your Senator and demand they oppose the introduction or passage of the Exclusive Citizenship Act, arguing for the protection of constitutional citizenship rights for all Americans.

---

Sources

• US exclusive citizenship act: MAGA senator accidentally targets Melania, Barron Trump - what the bill proposes - The Times of India
• US Senator proposes to introduce new bill ending dual citizenship - The Economic Times
• Why Is Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno's Bill to End Dual Nationality a Cynical Play? - Law Firm for Immigrants
• Afroyim v. Rusk | 387 U.S. 253 (1967) - Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center