Multi-Front Backlash Erupts Against Missouri GOP's Mid-Decade Gerrymander (H.B. 1)

The Missouri gerrymander backlash 2025 has erupted across multiple fronts, driven by significant lawsuits, political defiance, and direct citizen action against the state’s Republican leadership, including Governor Mike Kehoe and the General Assembly. This intense resistance follows the rapid enactment of the mid-decade congressional redistricting map, H.B. 1, in September 2025.

This redistricting effort was reportedly pressured by President Trump and explicitly designed to eliminate the Democratic 5th Congressional District (CD 5) and cement a dominating 7-1 Republican majority in the state delegation. Critics argue that the GOP demonstrated an alarming willingness to act outside of constitutional bounds and circumvent democratic accountability solely for partisan gain.

Constitutional and Legal Challenges to the New Map

The most significant form of resistance to the mid-decade map came via the courts. A major lawsuit was filed on behalf of Missouri voters by the Campaign Legal Center, the ACLU Voting Rights Project, and the ACLU of Missouri.

The suit challenges the 2025 map on several critical constitutional grounds, arguing that the effort violates established precedent and law:

Violation of Timing Requirement:

State Supreme Court precedent (*Preisler v. Doherty*) dictates that congressional redistricting occurs only once per decade following the decennial census certification. Since the 2022 map already fulfilled this requirement, the 2025 mid-decade change is challenged as unauthorized and unconstitutional.

Violation of Compactness (Partisan Gerrymander):

The lawsuit asserts that the new map violates the constitutional mandate that districts must be "as compact... as may be". The 2025 map drastically reduces compactness by fracturing the closely united Kansas City metropolitan area (CD 5), merging urban areas with distant rural counties that share few common interests. This maneuver is illegal, as Missouri law prohibits deviating from compactness for "partisan or political reasons," supporting the argument that the sole intent was political gain.

Process Flaws and Errors:

The rushed legislative process was criticized for a lack of transparency, as the map was not publicly released in a standard electronic geographic format. This resulted in a "basic infirmity" where one Kansas City precinct (VTD 811) was double-assigned to two different congressional districts (CDs 4 and 5), potentially rendering the map malapportioned or noncontiguous.

Political Dissent and Legislative Defiance

The highly partisan effort faced strong political criticism, drawing opposition even from within the GOP ranks:

Democratic Outrage:

Democrats fiercely condemned Governor Kehoe, with House Minority Leader Ashley Aune calling him a "puppet" of President Trump for agreeing to redraw the map early, thereby breaking six decades of precedent. Senate Minority Leader Doug Beck argued that Republicans acted out of fear of "mean tweets from Donald Trump" and were "scared of Missourians having power at the ballot box".

Republican Dissent and Retribution:

Some GOP lawmakers initially expressed reluctance, noting that performing redistricting outside the census cycle "would be out of character" for Missouri. During the special session, two Republican Senators, Mike Moon and Lincoln Hough, ultimately voted against the Trump-backed plan. Notably, Senator Hough was subsequently removed as chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee following his dissenting votes.

Suppression of Citizen Referendum Rights

Citizens attempted to exercise their constitutional power to veto the measure, leading to a direct conflict with state officials.

Referendum Petition Blocked:

The pro-voting coalition "People Not Politicians" mobilized quickly and filed a referendum petition aimed at allowing Missourians to vote on H.B. 1 in the 2026 election, thereby temporarily suspending the gerrymandered map.

Attorney General Intervention:

Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway rejected the referendum petition. Voting rights advocates called this decision a "blatant effort to sabotage voters' ability to fight against the partisan gerrymander". Critics pointed out that the Attorney General incorrectly cited the section of the state constitution dealing with initiatives (Article III, Section 50) instead of the correct referendum section (Article III, Section 52(a)).

Attacks on Direct Democracy:

The redistricting session concurrently advanced a separate measure to make future citizen-led constitutional amendments harder to pass by requiring a "concurrent majority" (a statewide majority *and* a majority in five congressional districts). Democrats condemned the GOP for using procedural maneuvers to "effectively shut down debate" on attempts to block these efforts, equating the combined actions to overriding the will of the people.

---

Sources

• Mid-Decade Redistricting: Why State Courts Should Be Suspicious - Election Law Blog
• 2025 Missouri proposed redistricting - Wikipedia
• 2516-CV29597.pdf - ACLU of Missouri (A court document/petition for injunctive and declaratory relief filed in the Circuit Court of Jackson County)
• Campaign Legal Center and Partners Sue to Fight Missouri's New Gerrymandered Congressional Map - campaignlegal.org
• Gerrymandering Away Missouri's Future.pdf - Brennan Center for Justice
• MO Governor Kehoe won't confirm redistricting; Republicans in the room say it's likely : r/missouri - Reddit
• Missouri Attorney General Blocks Voter Referendum on GOP Gerrymander - www.democracydocket.com
• Missouri Democrats Slam Republicans on Extreme Measures Taken To Overturn Will of Voters - www.missouridemocrats.org
• Missouri Legislature passes Congressional redistricting, Constitutional amendment changes - www.missourinet.com
• Missouri governor calls lawmakers back to Capitol to gerrymander congressional map - www.ksdk.com